Trump slams Biden as a âcrooked politicianâ as former president sues DOJ
Trump slams Biden as a âcrooked politicianâ as former president sues DOJ
Alanna Durkin Richer and Owen Scott Wed, May 27, 2026 at 1:45 PM UTC
94
President Donald Trump has branded his predecessor Joe Biden a âcrooked politicianâ after the former president sued the Department of Justice to block the release of audio recordings and transcripts from private interviews he performed with his memoirâs ghostwriter.
The materials were originally obtained by the special counsel investigating Bidenâs handling of classified documents.
Trump hit out at the news with a blunt caption on Truth Social while sharing a report about Bidenâs legal action.
âA Crooked Politician!!!â Trump wrote Tuesday.
A federal lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday alleges that Trumpâs Justice Department intends to release the materials to Congress and right-wing Heritage Foundation, which has filed its own lawsuit to obtain Bidenâs remarks to Mark Zwonitzer while they were writing Promise Me, Dad: A Year of Hope, Hardship, and Purpose.
The Justice Department had previously argued that the documents were exempt from disclosure under public records law.
Joe Bidenâs legal team alleges that TrumpâsJustice Department intends to release materials from his private interviews with his memoirâs ghostwriter to Congress and the conservative Heritage Foundation (Reuters)
The former presidentâs attorneys contend that such a disclosure would âconstitute an unwarranted invasion of President Bidenâs privacy.â
âEvery American, including a sitting or former Vice President, has a right to privacy in the personal conversations he has within his own home,â they wrote. âAnd when the U.S. Department of Justice obtains that private information through a criminal investigation, the Department bears a particular responsibility to protect it from disclosure.â
Special counsel Robert Hur scrutinized materials during his investigation into the Bidenâs alleged retention of classified documents (AFP/Getty)
The core of the dispute involves audio recordings and transcripts from Zwonitzerâs interviews with Biden at his home in 2016 and 2017.
Advertisement
Special counsel Robert Hur scrutinized these files during his investigation into the presidentâs retention of classified documents from his time as a senator and vice president.
Hurâs year-long probe culminated in a 345-page report that questioned Bidenâs age and mental competence but ultimately recommended no criminal charges against the then-81-year-old, citing insufficient evidence for a successful prosecution.
That legal battle is distinct from Bidenâs ongoing efforts to block the release of audio from his interview with Hur. In 2024, the House of Representatives voted to hold then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to hand over the audio after the White House asserted executive privilege to shield it.
In 2024, the House voted to hold then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to hand over audio from Bidenâs interview with special counsel Robert Hur after the White House asserted executive privilege to shield it (Getty)
Transcripts of five hours of Bidenâs interviews with federal prosecutors were released that same year.
While Biden maintained he took classified information seriously, the transcripts revealed instances in which he was unclear about dates and details, and he admitted he was unfamiliar with the paper trail for some sensitive documents he handled.
Republicans have criticized the Justice Department, alleging Biden received preferential treatment and that Trump was unfairly targeted by prosecutors.
Democrats, conversely, have emphasized Bidenâs cooperation in the investigation, drawing a stark contrast with the separate criminal case against Trump, who faced accusations of refusing to return classified documents requested by the National Archives from his Florida estate.
In that case, Trump faced 40 separate charges stemming from allegations that he withheld hundreds of documents and obstructed law enforcement attempts to get them back.
Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon ultimately dismissed the case after agreeing with Trumpâs attorneys that special counsel Jack Smith, who steered two sprawling federal cases against the president, was unconstitutionally appointed and funded. Smithâs team appealed that decision but dropped the case altogether after Trump won the 2024 presidential election.
Source: âAOL Breakingâ